A Modified TOPSIS Procedure in Psychological Profiling for Crime Scene Analysis
Keywords:
Psychological Profiling, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, TOPSIS, Resemblance Measure, Crime Scene Analysis, Decision SupportAbstract
Psychological profiling is an important technique in crime scene analysis, particularly when limited or no digital, physical, or forensic evidence is available at a crime scene. Psychological profiling can be defined as the process of identifying the probable physical, behavioral, and psychological characteristics of an unknown offender based on the actions and behavioral patterns exhibited during the commission of a crime. Such profiling can support investigators by narrowing the range of potential suspects and providing additional information about offender characteristics when conventional evidence is insufficient. This paper presents an extensive study of psychological profiling in the context of crime scene analysis and proposes a new decision-support methodology for evaluating potential offender profiles. The proposed methodology integrates the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with a resemblance measure and addresses decision-making problems involving multiple ideal solutions. This integration enables alternative psychological profiles to be evaluated according to their resemblance to different ideal profiles derived from crime scene characteristics. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology, a detailed case study involving five crime cases is conducted. The psychological characteristics of the offenders are evaluated based on information obtained from the corresponding crime scene analyses. The results demonstrate how the proposed approach can systematically differentiate among potential psychological profiles and support the identification of offender characteristics across different crime scenarios.
Downloads
References
Woodhams, J., Hollin, C. R., & Bull, R. (2007). The psychology of linking crimes: A review of the evidence. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X118631
Grubin, D., Kelly, P., & Brunsdon, C. (2001). Linking serious sexual assaults through behaviour (Home Office Research Study No. 215). Home Office: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. https://doi.org/10.1037/e649492007-001
Eze, S. M., Alabi, K. J., Ibrahim, S. O., Yusuf, A. O., Hamzat, F. O., Abdulrauf, A., Atoyebi, A. T., Lawal, I. A., Ibrahim, O. A., Imam-Fulani, A. Y., & Dare, B. J. (2025). Forensic psychology and criminal profiling. Journal of Forensic Science and Research, 9(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001085
Rogers, M. K. (2016). Psychological profiling as an investigative tool for digital forensics. In Digital Forensics: Threatscape and Best Practices (pp. 45–58). Syngress. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804526-8.00003-4
Djartov, B., Oswald, F. M., & Jakobi, J. (2024). Through the psychological lens: Unveiling biases in multi-criteria decision-making. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2024), 157, 175–184. AHFE International. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005476
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Oztaysi, B., & CevikOnar, S. (2023). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets with ordered pairs and their usage in multi-attribute decision making: A novel intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method with ordered pairs. Mathematics, 11(18), 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183867
Tuğrul, F. (2022). An approach utilizing the intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method to unmanned air vehicle selection. Ikonion Journal of Mathematics, 4(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.54286/ikjm.1174877
Garg, H., & Arora, R. (2020). TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient for solving decision-making problems with intuitionistic fuzzy soft set information. AIMS Mathematics, 5(4), 2944–2966. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020190
Quek, C., Tan, K. B., & Sagar, V. K. (2001). Pseudo-outer product based fuzzy neural network fingerprint verification system. Neural Networks, 14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00091-5
Grubesic, T. H. (2006). On the application of fuzzy clustering for crime hot-spot detection. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-9003-6
Li, S.T., Kuo, S.C., & Tsai, F.C. (2010). An intelligent decision-support model using FSOM and rule extraction for crime prevention. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 7108–7119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.004
Albertetti, F., Cotofrei, P., Grossrieder, L., Ribaux, O., & Stoffel, K. (2013). The CriLiM methodology: Crime linkage with a fuzzy MCDM approach. In 2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC) (pp. 67–74). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2013.17
Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2015). Crime detection and prevention using social network analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 126(6), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015906065
Goala, S., & Dutta, P. (2018). A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach to crime linkage. International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach, 11(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITSA.2018070103
Goala, S., Dutta, P., & Talukdar, P. (2019). Intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach to crime linkage using resemblance function. International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 5(4), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-019-0695-y
Goala, S., Limboo, B., Saikia, U., & Dutta, N. (2020). A new resemblance measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in serial crime detection. Advances in Mathematics: Scientific Journal, 9(12), 11075–11087. https://doi.org/10.37418/amsj.9.12.88
Burrell, A., Costello, B., & Woodhams, J. (2024). Methods used to link crimes using behaviour: A literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 79, Article 102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2024.102014
Bennell, C., & Canter, D. V. (2002). Linking commercial burglaries by modus operandi: Tests using regression and ROC analysis. Science & Justice, 42(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(02)71820-0
Dutta, P., & Banik, A. K. (2023). Crime linkage and psychological profiling of offenders under intuitionistic fuzzy environment using a novel resemblance measure. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(Suppl 1), 893–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10538-9
Li, G., Zhao, F., Yan, L., Chen, X., & Zhu, F. (2024). A modified TOPSIS method with rationality and consistency in ranking decision. Authorea Preprints. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.171640230.03565578/v1
Joshi, V. D., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Cepova, L., Kumar, R., & Dogra, N. (2024). Navigating uncertain distribution problem: A new approach for resolution optimization of transportation with several objectives under uncertainty. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 10, 1389791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2024.1389791
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Soumendra Goala, Pranjal Talukdar, Rupjit Saikia (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


